BOOK II - CHAPTER 7
THE LAW GIVEN, NOT TO RETAIN A PEOPLE FOR ITSELF, BUT TO KEEP ALIVE THE HOPE OF SALVATION IN CHRIST UNTIL HIS ADVENT
8. But while the unrighteousness and condemnation of all are attested by the law, it does not follow (if we make the proper use of it) that we are immediately to give up all hope and rush headlong on despair. No doubt, it has some such effect upon the reprobate, but this is owing to their obstinacy. With the children of God the effect is different. The Apostle testifies that the law pronounces its sentence of condemnation in order “that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God,” (Rom 3:19). In another place, however, the same Apostle declares, that “God has concluded them all in unbelief;” not that he might destroy all, or allow all to perish, but that “he might have mercy upon all,” (Rom 11:32); in other words, that divesting themselves of an absurd opinion of their own virtue, they may perceive how they are wholly dependent on the hand of God; that feeling how naked and destitute they are, they may take refuge in his mercy, rely upon it, and cover themselves up entirely with it; renouncing all righteousness and merit, and clinging to mercy alone, as offered in Christ to all who long and look for it in true faith. In the precepts of the law, God is seen as the rewarder only of perfect righteousness (a righteousness of which all are destitute), and, on the other hand, as the stern avenger of wickedness. But in Christ his countenance beams forth full of grace and gentleness towards poor unworthy sinners.
9. There are many passages in Augustine, as to the utility of the law in leading us to implore Divine assistance. Thus he writes to Hilary, “The law orders, that we, after attempting to do what is ordered and so feeling our weakness under the law, may learn to implore the help of grace.” In like manner, he writes to Asellius, “The utility of the law is, that it convinces man of his weakness, and compels him to apply for the medicine of grace, which is in Christ.” In like manner, he says to Innocentius Romanus, “The law orders; grace supplies the power of acting.” Again, to Valentinus, “God enjoins what we cannot do, in order that we may know what we have to ask of him.” Again, “The law was given, that it might make you guilty—being made guilty might fear; fearing, might ask indulgence, not presume on your own strength.” Again, “The law was given, in order to convert a great into a little man—to show that you have no power of your own for righteousness; and might thus, poor, needy, and destitute, flee to grace.” He afterwards thus addresses the Almighty, “So do, O Lord, so do, O merciful Lord; command what cannot be fulfilled; nay, command what cannot be fulfilled, unless by thy own grace: so that when men feel they have no strength in themselves to fulfil it, every mouth may be stopped, and no man seem great in his own eyes. Let all be little ones; let the whole world become guilty before God.” But I am forgetting myself in producing so many passages, since this holy man wrote a distinct treatise, which he entitled De Spiritu et Litera. The other branch of this first use he does not describe so distinctly, either because he knew that it depended on the former, or because he was not so well aware of it, or because he wanted words in which he might distinctly and clearly explain its proper meaning. But even in the reprobate themselves, this first office of the law is not altogether wanting. They do not, indeed, proceed so far with the children of God as, after the flesh is cast down, to be renewed in the inner man, and revive again, but stunned by the first terror, give way to despair. Still it tends to manifest the equity of the Divine judgment, when their consciences are thus heaved upon the waves. They would always willingly carp at the judgment of God; but now, though that judgment is not manifested, still the alarm produced by the testimony of the law and of their conscience bespeaks their deserts.
10. The second office of the Law is, by means of its fearful denunciations and the consequent dread of punishment, to curb those who, unless forced, have no regard for rectitude and justice. Such persons are curbed not because their mind is inwardly moved and affected, but because, as if a bridle were laid upon them, they refrain their hands from external acts, and internally check the depravity which would otherwise petulantly burst forth. It is true, they are not on this account either better or more righteous in the sight of God. For although restrained by terror or shame, they dare not proceed to what their mind has conceived, nor give full license to their raging lust, their heart is by no means trained to fear and obedience. Nay, the more they restrain themselves, the more they are inflamed, the more they rage and boil, prepared for any act or outbreak whatsoever were it not for the terror of the law. And not only so, but they thoroughly detest the law itself, and execrate the Lawgiver; so that if they could, they would most willingly annihilate him, because they cannot bear either his ordering what is right, or his avenging the despisers of his Majesty. The feeling of all who are not yet regenerate, though in some more, in others less lively, is, that in regard to the observance of the law, they are not led by voluntary submission, but dragged by the force of fear. Nevertheless, this forced and extorted righteousness is necessary for the good of society, its peace being secured by a provision but for which all things would be thrown into tumult and confusion. Nay, this tuition is not without its use, even to the children of God, who, previous to their effectual calling, being destitute of the Spirit of holiness, freely indulge the lusts of the flesh. When, by the fear of Divine vengeance, they are deterred from open outbreakings, though, from not being subdued in mind, they profit little at present, still they are in some measure trained to bear the yoke of righteousness, so that when they are called, they are not like mere novices, studying a discipline of which previously they had no knowledge. This office seems to be especially in the view of the Apostle, when he says, “That the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for men-stealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,” (1 Tim 1:9, 10). He thus indicates that it is a restraint on unruly lusts that would otherwise burst all bonds.
11. To both may be applied the declaration of the Apostle in another place, that “The law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ,” (Gal 3:24); since there are two classes of persons, whom by its training it leads to Christ. Some (of whom we spoke in the first place), from excessive confidence in their own virtue or righteousness, are unfit to receive the grace of Christ, until they are completely humbled. This the law does by making them sensible of their misery, and so disposing them to long for what they previously imagined they did not want. Others have need of a bridle to restrain them from giving full scope to their passions, and thereby utterly losing all desire after righteousness. For where the Spirit of God rules not, the lusts sometimes so burst forth, as to threaten to drown the soul subjected to them in forgetfulness and contempt of God; and so they would, did not God interpose with this remedy. Those, therefore, whom he has destined to the inheritance of his kingdom, if he does not immediately regenerate, he, through the works of the law, preserves in fear, against the time of his visitation, not, indeed, that pure and chaste fear which his children ought to have, but a fear useful to the extent of instructing them in true piety according to their capacity. Of this we have so many proofs, that there is not the least need of an example. For all who have remained for some time in ignorance of God will confess, as the result of their own experience, that the law had the effect of keeping them in some degree in the fear and reverence of God, till, being regenerated by his Spirit, they began to love him from the heart.
12. The third use of the Law (being also the principal use, and more closely connected with its proper end) has respect to believers in whose hearts the Spirit of God already flourishes and reigns. For although the Law is written and engraven on their hearts by the finger of God, that is, although they are so influenced and actuated by the Spirit, that they desire to obey God, there are two ways in which they still profit in the Law. For it is the best instrument for enabling them daily to learn with greater truth and certainty what that will of the Lord is which they aspire to follow, and to confirm them in this knowledge; just as a servant who desires with all his soul to approve himself to his master, must still observe, and be careful to ascertain his master’s dispositions, that he may comport himself in accommodation to them. Let none of us deem ourselves exempt from this necessity, for none have as yet attained to such a degree of wisdom, as that they may not, by the daily instruction of the Law, advance to a purer knowledge of the Divine will. Then, because we need not doctrine merely, but exhortation also, the servant of God will derive this further advantage from the Law: by frequently meditating upon it, he will be excited to obedience, and confirmed in it, and so drawn away from the slippery paths of sin. In this way must the saints press onward, since, however great the alacrity with which, under the Spirit, they hasten toward righteousness, they are retarded by the sluggishness of the flesh, and make less progress than they ought. The Law acts like a whip to the flesh, urging it on as men do a lazy sluggish ass. Even in the case of a spiritual man, inasmuch as he is still burdened with the weight of the flesh, the Law is a constant stimulus, pricking him forward when he would indulge in sloth. David had this use in view when he pronounced this high eulogium on the Law, “The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes,” (Ps 19:7, 8). Again, “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path,” (Ps 119:105). The whole psalm abounds in passages to the same effect. Such passages are not inconsistent with those of Paul, which show not the utility of the law to the regenerate, but what it is able of itself to bestow. The object of the Psalmist is to celebrate the advantages which the Lord, by means of his law, bestows on those whom he inwardly inspires with a love of obedience. And he adverts not to the mere precepts, but also to the promise annexed to them, which alone makes that sweet which in itself is bitter. For what is less attractive than the law, when, by its demands and threatening, it overawes the soul, and fills it with terror? David specially shows that in the law he saw the Mediator, without whom it gives no pleasure or delight.
13. Some unskilful persons, from not attending to this, boldly discard the whole law of Moses, and do away with both its Tables, imagining it unchristian to adhere to a doctrine which contains the ministration of death. Far from our thoughts be this profane notion. Moses has admirably shown that the Law, which can produce nothing but death in sinners, ought to have a better and more excellent effect upon the righteous. When about to die, he thus addressed the people, “Set your hearts unto all the words which I testify among you this day, which ye shall command your children to observe to do, all the words of this law. For it is not a vain thing for you; because it is your life,” (Deut 32:46, 47). If it cannot be denied that it contains a perfect pattern of righteousness, then, unless we ought not to have any proper rule of life, it must be impious to discard it. There are not various rules of life, but one perpetual and inflexible rule; and, therefore, when David describes the righteous as spending their whole lives in meditating on the Law (Psalm 1:2), we must not confine to a single age, an employment which is most appropriate to all ages, even to the end of the world. Nor are we to be deterred or to shun its instructions, because the holiness which it prescribes is stricter than we are able to render, so long as we bear about the prison of the body. It does not now perform toward us the part of a hard taskmaster, who will not be satisfied without full payment; but, in the perfection to which it exhorts us, points out the goal at which, during the whole course of our lives, it is not less our interest than our duty to aim. It is well if we thus press onward. Our whole life is a race, and after we have finished our course, the Lord will enable us to reach that goal to which, at present, we can only aspire in wish.
2 comments:
Mike Horton recently spoke about John Calvin on Law and Gospel at the Calvin's Legacy Conference. Following is an excerpt of his lecture.
Calvin wouldn't like this conference very much because he didn't have time to talk about himself. He was too busy talking about Christ and his gospel. He was so good on the gospel.
Calvin faced a church that was semi-Pelagian. If we need a new Reformation.
Calvin's definition of the gospel, and of the law, and the relation of the two. Not everything is "the gospel." One of the themes of the "Christian vision" project. Theme: What is the gospel? Good question. In nearly all the essays published, the doing and dying of Christ was assumed but the gospel wasn't explicitly defined in terms of Christ's doing and dying for us.
Not everything good and healthy for the church is the gospel. He distinguished the gospel from its vast benefits and effects. Like Paul he had a very specific definition of the gospel: the death, burial, and resurrection of the gospel. Simple. Basic. Simple. Justification is the "primary article" of the Christian religion. Reformed folk need to hear this. No "central dogma" in Calvin from which everything can be deduced. Lots think they are Calvinists because they are predestinarians. There is no "central dogma" of Calvinism, except perhaps Christ -- God gives himself to us us through his incarnate Word.
The gospel isn't one doctrine among many but the primary article. "The main hinge on which religion turns." "The principle article...the foundation of all religion." Melancththon and Calvin influenced each other as they worked out Luther's rediscovered gospel. The "Lutheran view" was actually formulated in concert by Melanchthon and Calvin. "This righteousness consists in the remission of sins...and in this, that the righteousness of Jesus Christ is imputed to us."
According to the evangelical interpretation of justification it's not a process of moral transformation. Gospel has that effect but it isn't transformation. The good news isn't that you are transformed inwardly. The objective announcement of the good news transforms us. The radical sects, for whom everything was "inner" weren't interested in the Protestant doctrine of justification any more than Rome was.
In Calvin's view, this gospel creates the faith that receives it. By hearing this good news, the Spirit gives us willing arms to embrace it. He pries our curved in fingers from our lives and gives us this gift and the faith to receive it. It doesn't "command" anything. It gives. The law commands. The gospel gives. Both are necessary but they do different things. The gospel is a "firm and sure knowledge of God's favor toward us." Revealed to our minds and sealed to our hearts. Faith is confidence in God's favor and salvation. Same view in HC 21.
Calvin on law. Inherited threefold distinction (civil, ceremonial, and moral) from Thomas Aquinas. For Calvin, the idea of re-instituting the Mosaic civil law is Anabaptist fanaticism. Civil law comes from "equity." The decalogue is the moral, natural law, written on the conscience, known by all. Love of neighbor. Civil laws may differ from each other and from Jewish law. Fine. Not a problem. Test case: usury. Medieval church had rejected interest charged by Christians of Christians. Luther inherited this (from Deut). Calvin said that the principle is love of neighbor. We're not bound to Jewish civil law. So we can't charge too much interest (usury) but we can charge interest.
Relation of law and gospel. Calvin no innovator. Calvin was conservative of the past. He followed Luther (rather than Aquinas). In the medieval church the old law was hard and the new law was easier. More grace. Love God and neighbor, as if that was easier. The gospel is not a new law. The gospel is one thing, the law is another. Two different kinds of words. They do different things.
Luther matured. In most instance law does not equal OT and gospel does not equal NT but rather the law demands (wherever it is found) and the gospel gives, where ever it is found. Calvin followed the mature Luther. Calvin wasn't thinking OT vs NT. Law is principle of works. This is how Luther came to view the law as always accusing. Melanchthon clarified. Law and gospel = commands and promises not OT/NT. Calvin continued to speak of Law and Gospel in the redemptive historical sense (OT = law and NT = gospel) and in the doctrinal sense, law and gospel as demand and promise. The OT has less light, the NT has greater light (Thomas). There is that second sense. If you conflate the doctrinal sense of law and gospel...more damnation.
Against the Anabaptists, who argued that the OT was radically discontinuous with the NT on baptism. The Reformed emphasis the continuity of the OT and NT. If we read Calvin selectively we might miss the sense in which he's speaking of law and gospel (historical v. doctrinal).
To get Calvin right we need to distinguish between the law as history and the law as principle. In both sense the law drives us to Christ but in different ways. As history it drives us to law by promises and in the latter by threats.
In his preface to his commentary on the Pentateuch, "the whole purpose of the law is to shut us up...." to drive us to Christ. Here Calvin was a Lutheran as were most Reformed theologies until very recently. He wasn't inventing a new tradition. No fundamental difference between Luther and Calvin. Otto Weber says Luther and Calvin were both following Augustine here.
In developing his apologetic for the unity of the covenant of grace against the Anabaptists, but when we're mining Calvin quotes note his nuance. Note the way he's using "law and gospel." I. John Hesselink says that, for Calvin, the law doesn't produce faith. Faith comes from the gospel.
Calvin's explicit statements on the law/gospel distinction in the doctrinal sense, as methods of justification. On the "fatherly indulgence of God," Calvin treats God the Father as a "liberal father." Spirit of bondage vs the spirit of adoption. The spirit of bondage comes from the law, the spirit of adoption comes from the gospel. Certainty of salvation appears from comparison of opposites. We're no longer bound by the servile condition of the law (doctrinal sense). The covenant of grace is contained in the law (historical sense). In the same breath Calvin moved between the historical and doctrinal senses of "law." doctrinally considered, it differs completely from the law. No graciousness in the law, doctrinally, no rigor in the gospel, in the doctrinal sense.
Paul connects fear with the law, confidence with the gospel. If we ask the law about peace with a holy God. In that case there is total opposition between law and gospel.
Melanchthon invented the threefold use of the law. Luther started talking like that. He's less nuanced. It depends upon whom and what is in view. To a legalist he sounds antinomian. To the antinomian, he sounds like a legalist. Calvin elaborates it 4 years alter than Melanchthon. The law does more than terrify. When believers rely on the law to measure their holiness, they must give no place to the law but only to the gospel. We listen to the precepts of the law but not to the terrors. It's not "law, gospel, law" -- we don't "put people back under the law." The gospel must be daily repeated.
Why is the third use the "principle use"? Because our relation to the law, as believers has changed. Calvin believed more than Luther that the law cannot condemn the believer. The only office the law has for believers is to show the life of gratitude. Out of the gospel indicatives we're given evangelical imperatives. For Calvin this is the NT pattern. Whenever preachers preach the law to believers according to the first use, this is a violation of office. That's why the third use is the principle use. Now the law guides us. It's our friend, not a terror. The precepts come to guide, lead us. That's why in Calvin's liturgies, sometimes the law came before the confession of sin and absolution and sometimes after. It's in HC 3 but the treatment of the law comes under part 3. Luther follows the same order in the small catechism.
Just as the law demands work, the gospel only that we bring faith to receive. The law speaks but it cannot reform our hearts. It makes us more culpable. The gospel does not say "do this or that" but "believe."
http://www.wscal.edu/blog/conference2009/plenary4.php
Derek Thomas of reformation21 says:
The pedagogic (and first) use of law is to "shut our mouths" (Rom. 3:19), not so as to lead us to utter despair (as is the case with the reprobate) but to lead us to Christ: "But in Christ his face shines, full of grace and gentleness, even upon us poor and unworthy sinners" (2.7.8). This is true not just for unbelievers as they first come to Christ but for believers too.
The second use of the law is as a civil code so that "hindered by fright or shame, they dare neither execute what they have conceived in their minds, nor openly breathe forth the rage of their lust" (2.7.10).
The third ("principal," "proper") use of law "finds its place among believers in whose hearts the Spirit of God already lives and reigns" (2.7.12). And because we can never keep it as it demands, this should not "frighten us away." We must see this life of ours in Christ as "a race" (1 Cor. 9:24-26), "when its course has been run, the Lord will grant us to attain that goal to which our efforts now press forward from afar" (2.7.13). Thus, in the Genevan Catechism, he asked, "What is the rule of life which [God] has given us?" and replied, "His law." And sometimes, even among believers, the law functions as whip: "The law is to the flesh like a whip to an idle and balky ass, to arouse it to work. Even for a spiritual man not yet free of the weight of the flesh the law remains a constant sting that will not let him stand still" (2.7.12).
Calvin has only just begun to expound on the law's function in the Christian life but already we sense the magnitude of what he is saying and he was to see detractors in his day as we see in our own.
http://www.reformation21.org/calvin/2009/03/blog-59-278-2713.php
Post a Comment